NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. PSW 200 vs PSW 300

Peaq PSW 200 vs Peaq PSW 300

What PSW 200 does better (1) and where PSW 300 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Peaq PSW 200
Peaq · 2026PSW 200
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $45
vs
Peaq PSW 300
Peaq · 2026PSW 300
9.6Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
6.7Display9.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

PSW 200PSW 300
44 × 44941 × 4113
PSW 200PSW 300Difference
Case size44 mm41 mm+3 mm
Thickness9 mm13 mm−4 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PSW 200 better than PSW 300?

  1. Thickness9 mm vs 13 mm+44%

Why is PSW 300 better than PSW 200?

  1. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.85″+40%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare