Dimensions
Size comparison
PSW 200PSW 300
| PSW 200 | PSW 300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 44 mm | 41 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 13 mm | −4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PSW 200 better than PSW 300?
- Thickness9 mm vs 13 mm+44%
Why is PSW 300 better than PSW 200?
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.85″+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | 41 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 13 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 12 days | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 240 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |









