Why is PSW 300 better than Ares 3?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 3 days4×
- Screen size1.85″ vs 1.75″+6%
Why is Ares 3 better than PSW 300?
- Battery capacity240 mAh vs 380 mAh+58%
- Thickness13 mm vs 12.7 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 41 mm | — |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.85″ | 1.75″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 296 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 12 days | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | 240 mAh | 380 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
