NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Vantage M3 vs Race S

Polar Vantage M3 vs Suunto Race S

What Vantage M3 does better (1) and where Race S wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $430
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
7 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
6.4Display4.8
3.0Battery life4.6
8.3Health tracking4.9
2.9Sports & outdoor6.4
4.1Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Vantage M3Race S
44.7 × 44.712.245 × 4511.4
Vantage M3Race SDifference
Height44.7 mm45 mm−0.3 mm
Width44.7 mm45 mm−0.3 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.4 mm+0.8 mm
Weight53 g53 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vantage M3 better than Race S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race S: No

Why is Race S better than Vantage M3?

  1. GPS battery life27 h vs 40 h+48%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 9 days+12%
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.32″+3%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  6. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
  7. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.4 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare