vs
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
TechLife Watch R1002.0
| TechLife Watch R100 | 2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mm | 46 mm | = |
| Thickness | 12.2 mm | 13 mm | −0.8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TechLife Watch R100 better than 2.0?
- Battery capacity380 mAh vs 300 mAh+27%
- Thickness12.2 mm vs 13 mm+7%
Why is 2.0 better than TechLife Watch R100?
- Built-in GPSNo · TechLife Watch R100: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 54 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 46 g | — |
| Thickness | 12.2 mm | 13 mm |
| Height | 54.1 mm | — |
| Width | 46 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Ceramic |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | — |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | — |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | — |
| Pixel density | 278 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery life (hours) | — | 168 h |
| Battery capacity | 380 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
