NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Race 3S vs Vertical

Suunto Race 3S vs Suunto Vertical

What Race 3S does better (6) and where Vertical wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
6 advantages≈ $490
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
7.1Display4.4
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.2Sports & outdoor6.4
4.8Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Race 3SVertical
46 × 4611.449 × 4913.6
Race 3SVerticalDifference
Height46 mm49 mm−3 mm
Width46 mm49 mm−3 mm
Thickness11.4 mm13.6 mm−2.2 mm
Weight56 g86 g−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Race 3S better than Vertical?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  2. Weight56 g vs 86 g+54%
  3. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  4. Pixel density353 ppi vs 200 ppi+76%
  5. Resolution (width)466 px vs 280 px+66%
  6. Thickness11.4 mm vs 13.6 mm+19%

Why is Vertical better than Race 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 20.8 days+73%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.4″+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare