vs
2.2Display2.2
2.5Smart features2.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
WatchWatch Live
| Watch | Watch Live | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 40.6 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 34.6 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 10.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 36 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch better than Watch Live?
Watch has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch Live better than Watch?
- Thickness12 mm vs 10.8 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 41 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 35.7 g |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 10.8 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 40.6 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 34.6 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Coral Pink, Turquoise | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
