NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Smartwatches
  3. Ice Watch Fit 1.0
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Ice Watch Fit 1.0

10 fitness bands at a similar price that compete with the Fit 1.0 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the Fit 1.0

Amazfit Helio Core
1
Amazfit · 2025Helio Core
8% cheaper ≈ $70
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 10 days vs 5 days
  • Water resistance 5 ATM vs 3 ATM
  • Thickness 9.6 mm vs 12 mm
  • Built-in GPS
Huawei Band 11 Pro
5
Huawei · 2026Band 11 Pro
8.9
14% cheaper ≈ $65
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 14 days vs 5 days
  • Water resistance 5 ATM vs 3 ATM
  • Thickness 9 mm vs 12 mm
  • Screen size 1.62″ vs 1.78″
  • Resolution (width) 286 px vs 368 px
Huawei Watch Fit 3
6
Huawei · 2024Watch Fit 3
9.2
26% pricier ≈ $95
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 10 days vs 5 days
  • Water resistance 5 ATM vs 3 ATM
  • Screen size 1.82″ vs 1.78″
Bea-Fon Watch 102
7
Bea-Fon · 2025Watch 102
9.6
53% cheaper ≈ $35
  • Screen size 1.83″ vs 1.78″
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 4 days vs 5 days
Fitbit Air
8
Fitbit · 2026Air
57% pricier ≈ $120
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 7 days vs 5 days
  • Thickness 8.3 mm vs 12 mm
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro
9
Xiaomi · 2026Smart Band 10 Pro
7.2
Same price ≈ $75
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 7 days vs 5 days
  • Water resistance 5 ATM vs 3 ATM
  • Thickness 9.7 mm vs 12 mm
  • Screen size 1.72″ vs 1.78″
  • Resolution (width) 336 px vs 368 px
Huawei Band 11
10
Huawei · 2026Band 11
9.1
43% cheaper ≈ $45
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 14 days vs 5 days
  • Water resistance 5 ATM vs 3 ATM
  • Thickness 9 mm vs 12 mm
  • Screen size 1.62″ vs 1.78″
  • Resolution (width) 286 px vs 368 px
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare