Abyx Fit Touch 3 vs S&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
What Fit Touch 3 does better (0) and where Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display9.3
Why is Fit Touch 3 better than Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren?
Fit Touch 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren better than Fit Touch 3?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fit Touch 3: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | 48 g | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 230 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsAbyx Fit Touch 35.45.2
vsKodak SW-7204 SmartwatchvsAbyx Fit Touch 3
vsAmazfit Helio CorevsAbyx Fit Touch 3
vsHEYRO Fit 21vsAbyx Fit Touch 34.75.2
vsHaylou RS4 PlusvsAbyx Fit Touch 3
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 ProvsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren