vs
8.4Display9.1
Why is Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space better than Watch 102?
- Battery capacity260 mAh vs 250 mAh+4%
Why is Watch 102 better than Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space?
- Screen size1.75″ vs 1.83″+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.75″ | 1.83″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 4 days |
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | 250 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 ProvsAbyx Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space
vsKodak SW-7204 SmartwatchvsAbyx Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space
vsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, HerrenvsAbyx Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space
vsHuawei Band 11 ProvsAbyx Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space
vsOPS!SMART Call Max AMOLED SmartwatchvsAbyx Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space
vsS&T Design Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, HerrenvsAbyx Fit Touch 5 Naruto Uzumaki Smartwatch AMOLED space