NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Active 2 (Round) vs Bip 6

Amazfit Active 2 (Round) vs Amazfit Bip 6

What Active 2 (Round) does better (4) and where Bip 6 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Active 2 (Round)
Amazfit · 2024Active 2 (Round)
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $100
vs
Amazfit Bip 6
Amazfit · 2025Bip 6
9.5Score
6 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
7.3Display7.7
6.3Battery life9.0
8.7Build & durability8.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Active 2 (Round)Bip 6
43.9 × 43.99.946.3 × 40.210.4
Active 2 (Round)Bip 6Difference
Height43.9 mm40.2 mm+3.7 mm
Width43.9 mm46.3 mm−2.4 mm
Thickness9.9 mm10.4 mm−0.5 mm
Weight30 g28 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Active 2 (Round) better than Bip 6?

  1. Resolution (width)466 px vs 390 px+19%
  2. Pixel density353 ppi vs 302 ppi+17%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 140+14%
  4. Thickness9.9 mm vs 10.4 mm+6%

Why is Bip 6 better than Active 2 (Round)?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 14 days+40%
  2. GPS battery life21 h vs 32 h+52%
  3. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.97″+49%
  4. Weight29.5 g vs 27.9 g+6%
  5. Battery saver mode19 days vs 26 days+37%
  6. Battery capacity270 mAh vs 340 mAh+26%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare