NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Active 2 (Round) vs Watch GT

Amazfit Active 2 (Round) vs Vivo Watch GT

What Active 2 (Round) does better (5) and where Watch GT wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Active 2 (Round)
Amazfit · 2024Active 2 (Round)
8.6Score
5 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Vivo Watch GT
Vivo · 2024Watch GT
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $110
7.3Display8.7
8.7Build & durability2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Active 2 (Round)Watch GT
43.9 × 43.99.939.6 × 45.811.2
Active 2 (Round)Watch GTDifference
Height43.9 mm45.8 mm−1.9 mm
Width43.9 mm39.6 mm+4.3 mm
Thickness9.9 mm11.2 mm−1.3 mm
Weight30 g33 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Active 2 (Round) better than Watch GT?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 2 ATM2.5×
  2. Weight29.5 g vs 33 g+12%
  3. Resolution (width)466 px vs 390 px+19%
  4. Thickness9.9 mm vs 11.2 mm+13%
  5. Pixel density353 ppi vs 322 ppi+10%

Why is Watch GT better than Active 2 (Round)?

  1. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.85″+40%
  2. Battery capacity270 mAh vs 505 mAh+87%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare