vs
9.7Health tracking9.6
Why is Active 3 Premium better than Ring 2.0?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 6 days2×
Why is Ring 2.0 better than Active 3 Premium?
Ring 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 38 g | — |
| Thickness | 11 mm | — |
| Height | 45 mm | — |
| Width | 45 mm | — |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Sapphire crystal | Yes | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Sapphire glass | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 5 atm / 50 m |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Pixel density | 353 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 12 days | 6 days |
| GPS battery life | 24 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 365 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | — |
| HRV tracking | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Sport profiles | 170 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | Yes | — |
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Microphone | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Amazfit Active 3 PremiumvsVivo Watch GT2vs
Amazfit Active 3 PremiumvsGarett Prime Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glassvs
Amazfit Active 3 PremiumvsXiaomi Watch S5 46mm9.38.5vs
Amazfit Active 3 PremiumvsIce Watch ICE Smart Chic 2.0 Smartwatch Unisex, gold, Milanaise
vs
RingConn Gen3vsLuna Ring 2.0
vsOura Ring 5vsLuna Ring 2.0