vs
2.6Display4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Active EdgeICE Smart ST 2.0
| Active Edge | ICE Smart ST 2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46.6 mm | 41 mm | +5.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Active Edge better than ICE Smart ST 2.0?
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.2″+10%
- Battery capacity370 mAh vs 300 mAh+23%
Why is ICE Smart ST 2.0 better than Active Edge?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Active Edge: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 47 mm | 41 mm |
| Weight | 34 g | — |
| Thickness | 12 mm | — |
| Height | 46.6 mm | — |
| Width | 46.6 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Glass material + anti-fingerprint coating | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 10 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Roségold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | — |
| Pixel density | 277 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 16 days | — |
| Battery saver mode | 24 days | — |
| GPS battery life | 20 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 370 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Charging | Magnetic charging base | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Sport profiles | 130 | — |
| Dive mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
