NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Active Max vs T-Rex 2

Amazfit Active Max vs Amazfit T-Rex 2

What Active Max does better (8) and where T-Rex 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Active Max
Amazfit · 2025Active Max
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $170
Higher score
vs
Amazfit T-Rex 2
Amazfit · 2022T-Rex 2
9.5Score
1 advantage≈ $190
8.6Display8.0
9.7Battery life7.9
5.0Health tracking4.9
9.7Sports & outdoor9.6
5.7Build & durability8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Active MaxT-Rex 2
48.5 × 48.512.247.1 × 47.113.6
Active MaxT-Rex 2Difference
Height48.5 mm47.1 mm+1.4 mm
Width48.5 mm47.1 mm+1.4 mm
Thickness12.2 mm13.6 mm−1.5 mm
Weight40 g66 g−27 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Active Max better than T-Rex 2?

  1. GPS battery life64 h vs 50 h+28%
  2. Weight39.5 g vs 66.5 g+68%
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 24 days+4%
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.39″+8%
  5. Battery capacity658 mAh vs 500 mAh+32%
  6. Thickness12.2 mm vs 13.6 mm+12%
  7. Sport profiles170 vs 158+8%
  8. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is T-Rex 2 better than Active Max?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare