NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 2 vs T-Rex 3

Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3

What T-Rex 2 does better (2) and where T-Rex 3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 2
Amazfit · 2022T-Rex 2
9.5Score
2 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
vs
Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
6 advantages≈ $280
8.0Display8.3
7.9Battery life6.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor9.4
8.5Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 2T-Rex 3
47.1 × 47.113.648.5 × 48.513.8
T-Rex 2T-Rex 3Difference
Height47.1 mm48.5 mm−1.4 mm
Width47.1 mm48.5 mm−1.4 mm
Thickness13.6 mm13.8 mm−0.1 mm
Weight66 g68 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 2 better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life50 h vs 28 h+79%
  2. Weight66.5 g vs 68.3 g+3%

Why is T-Rex 3 better than T-Rex 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 27 days+12%
  2. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.5″+8%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 42 h+62%
  4. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 700 mAh+40%
  5. Sport profiles158 vs 170+8%
  6. Resolution (width)454 px vs 480 px+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare