NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs G-Squad DW-H5600

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Casio G-Squad DW-H5600

What T-Rex 3 does better (3) and where G-Squad DW-H5600 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $280
vs
Casio G-Squad DW-H5600
Casio · 2023G-Squad DW-H5600
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
6.9Battery life4.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
8.4Build & durability9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3G-Squad DW-H5600
48.5 × 48.513.844.5 × 51.117
T-Rex 3G-Squad DW-H5600Difference
Height48.5 mm51.1 mm−2.6 mm
Width48.5 mm44.5 mm+4 mm
Thickness13.8 mm17 mm−3.2 mm
Weight68 g59 g+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than G-Squad DW-H5600?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 7 days3.9×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · G-Squad DW-H5600: No
  3. Thickness13.8 mm vs 17 mm+24%

Why is G-Squad DW-H5600 better than T-Rex 3?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 20 ATM2×
  2. Weight68.3 g vs 59 g+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare