NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs NC83S

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs NikuTRAX NC83S

What T-Rex 3 does better (2) and where NC83S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
NikuTRAX NC83S
NikuTRAX · 2024NC83S
2 advantages≈ $270
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3NC83S
48.5 × 48.513.838 × 4816
T-Rex 3NC83SDifference
Height48.5 mm48 mm+0.5 mm
Width48.5 mm38 mm+10.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm16 mm−2.2 mm
Weight68 g55 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than NC83S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 6 days4.5×
  2. Thickness13.8 mm vs 16 mm+16%

Why is NC83S better than T-Rex 3?

  1. Weight68.3 g vs 55 g+24%
  2. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.69″+13%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare