NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs NC83S

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs NikuTRAX NC83S

What Forerunner 165 does better (3) and where NC83S wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
NikuTRAX NC83S
NikuTRAX · 2024NC83S
1 advantage≈ $270
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165NC83S
43 × 4311.638 × 4816
Forerunner 165NC83SDifference
Height43 mm48 mm−5 mm
Width43 mm38 mm+5 mm
Thickness11.6 mm16 mm−4.4 mm
Weight39 g55 g−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than NC83S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 6 days+83%
  2. Weight39 g vs 55 g+41%
  3. Thickness11.6 mm vs 16 mm+38%

Why is NC83S better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.69″+41%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare