NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 570 47mm

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm

What Forerunner 165 does better (3) and where Forerunner 570 47mm wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $250
vs
Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 47mm
4.7Score
4 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
5.3Display6.5
3.1Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking9.4
2.7Sports & outdoor5.5
3.5Build & durability2.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Forerunner 570 47mm
43 × 4311.647 × 4712.9
Forerunner 165Forerunner 570 47mmDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness11.6 mm12.9 mm−1.3 mm
Weight39 g50 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Forerunner 570 47mm?

  1. GPS battery life19 h vs 18 h+6%
  2. Weight39 g vs 50 g+28%
  3. Thickness11.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+11%

Why is Forerunner 570 47mm better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Sport profiles25 vs 833.3×
  2. Storage4 GB vs 8 GB2×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare