NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 570 42mm

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm

What Forerunner 165 does better (4) and where Forerunner 570 42mm wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
4 advantages≈ $250
vs
Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 42mm
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
5.3Display5.3
3.1Battery life2.6
4.9Health tracking9.4
2.7Sports & outdoor5.5
3.5Build & durability3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Forerunner 570 42mm
43 × 4311.642.4 × 42.412.9
Forerunner 165Forerunner 570 42mmDifference
Height43 mm42.4 mm+0.6 mm
Width43 mm42.4 mm+0.6 mm
Thickness11.6 mm12.9 mm−1.3 mm
Weight39 g42 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Forerunner 570 42mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 10 days+10%
  2. GPS battery life19 h vs 18 h+6%
  3. Weight39 g vs 42 g+8%
  4. Thickness11.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+11%

Why is Forerunner 570 42mm better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Sport profiles25 vs 833.3×
  2. Storage4 GB vs 8 GB2×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare