NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 265

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265

What Forerunner 165 does better (2) and where Forerunner 265 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $250
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
6 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
5.3Display5.0
3.1Battery life3.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.7Sports & outdoor5.0
3.5Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Forerunner 265
43 × 4311.646.1 × 46.112.9
Forerunner 165Forerunner 265Difference
Height43 mm46.1 mm−3.1 mm
Width43 mm46.1 mm−3.1 mm
Thickness11.6 mm12.9 mm−1.3 mm
Weight39 g47 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Weight39 g vs 47 g+21%
  2. Thickness11.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+11%

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 13 days+18%
  2. GPS battery life19 h vs 20 h+5%
  3. Sport profiles25 vs 582.3×
  4. Storage4 GB vs 8 GB2×
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare