NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 970

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 970

What Forerunner 165 does better (2) and where Forerunner 970 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $250
vs
Garmin Forerunner 970
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 970
5.9Score
7 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
5.3Display6.5
3.1Battery life4.7
4.9Health tracking8.3
2.7Sports & outdoor6.6
3.5Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Forerunner 970
43 × 4311.647 × 4712.9
Forerunner 165Forerunner 970Difference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness11.6 mm12.9 mm−1.3 mm
Weight39 g56 g−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Forerunner 970?

  1. Weight39 g vs 56 g+44%
  2. Thickness11.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+11%

Why is Forerunner 970 better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 15 days+36%
  2. GPS battery life19 h vs 26 h+37%
  3. Sport profiles25 vs 943.8×
  4. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  5. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 165: Yes
  6. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare