NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Balance 3 vs Galaxy Watch9

Amazfit Balance 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch9

What Balance 3 does better (5) and where Galaxy Watch9 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Balance 3
Amazfit · 2026Balance 3
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $370
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch9
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Watch9
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $380
8.6Display9.6
5.0Health tracking8.2
9.4Sports & outdoor3.1
5.2Smart features7.9
9.5Build & durability7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Balance 3Galaxy Watch9
51.4 × 51.412.543.7 × 468.6
Balance 3Galaxy Watch9Difference
Height51.4 mm46 mm+5.4 mm
Width51.4 mm43.7 mm+7.7 mm
Thickness12.5 mm8.6 mm+3.9 mm
Weight62 g34 g+28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Balance 3 better than Galaxy Watch9?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  2. Voice assistantYes · Galaxy Watch9: Yes
  3. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.47″+2%
  5. Battery capacity658 mAh vs 445 mAh+48%

Why is Galaxy Watch9 better than Balance 3?

  1. Weight62 g vs 34 g+82%
  2. Thickness12.5 mm vs 8.6 mm+45%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare