NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 5 vs Bip 6

Amazfit Bip 5 vs Amazfit Bip 6

What Bip 5 does better (1) and where Bip 6 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 5
Amazfit · 2023Bip 5
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $90
vs
Amazfit Bip 6
Amazfit · 2025Bip 6
9.5Score
8 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
4.2Display7.7
7.7Battery life9.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 5Bip 6
45.9 × 38.111.246.3 × 40.210.4
Bip 5Bip 6Difference
Height38.1 mm40.2 mm−2.1 mm
Width45.9 mm46.3 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness11.2 mm10.4 mm+0.8 mm
Weight26 g28 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 5 better than Bip 6?

  1. Weight26 g vs 27.9 g+7%

Why is Bip 6 better than Bip 5?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 14 days+40%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Bip 5: Yes
  3. Screen size1.91″ vs 1.97″+3%
  4. Resolution (width)320 px vs 390 px+22%
  5. Sport profiles120 vs 140+17%
  6. Pixel density260 ppi vs 302 ppi+16%
  7. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 340 mAh+13%
  8. Thickness11.2 mm vs 10.4 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare