NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 5 vs 8900

Amazfit Bip 5 vs Hama 8900

What Bip 5 does better (3) and where 8900 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 5
Amazfit · 2023Bip 5
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ $90
vs
Hama 8900
Hama · 20238900
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
4.2Display5.1
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 58900
45.9 × 38.111.242 × 42
Bip 58900Difference
Case size45.9 mm42 mm+3.9 mm
Weight26 g40 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 5 better than 8900?

  1. Weight26 g vs 40 g+54%
  2. Screen size1.91″ vs 1.3″+47%
  3. Voice assistantYes · 8900: Yes

Why is 8900 better than Bip 5?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Bip 5: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)320 px vs 466 px+46%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare