vs
5.1Display7.5
5.0Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
8900Watch S1 Active
| 8900 | Watch S1 Active | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 42 mm | 47.3 mm | −5.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 8900 better than Watch S1 Active?
8900 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch S1 Active better than 8900?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.43″+10%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 470 mAh+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | — |
| Thickness | — | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 46.5 mm |
| Width | — | 47.3 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Moon White, Space Black, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 470 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, ambient light | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
