NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 6 vs GTS 4 Mini

Amazfit Bip 6 vs Amazfit GTS 4 Mini

What Bip 6 does better (6) and where GTS 4 Mini wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 6
Amazfit · 2025Bip 6
9.5Score
6 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Amazfit GTS 4 Mini
AmazfitGTS 4 Mini
9.4Score
3 advantages≈ $100
7.7Display6.0
9.0Battery life8.4
8.9Build & durability8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 6GTS 4 Mini
46.3 × 40.210.441.8 × 36.79.1
Bip 6GTS 4 MiniDifference
Height40.2 mm36.7 mm+3.5 mm
Width46.3 mm41.8 mm+4.5 mm
Thickness10.4 mm9.1 mm+1.3 mm
Weight28 g31 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 6 better than GTS 4 Mini?

  1. GPS battery life32 h vs 21 h+52%
  2. Screen size1.97″ vs 1.65″+19%
  3. Weight27.9 g vs 31.2 g+12%
  4. Battery capacity340 mAh vs 270 mAh+26%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 336 px+16%
  6. Sport profiles140 vs 126+11%

Why is GTS 4 Mini better than Bip 6?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 15 days+7%
  2. Thickness10.4 mm vs 9.1 mm+15%
  3. Pixel density302 ppi vs 309 ppi+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare