vs
7.4Display8.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is Bip 6 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Weight31.6 g vs 160 g5.1×
- Battery capacity270 mAh vs 210 mAh+29%
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Bip 6?
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.7″+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | — |
| Weight | 31.6 g | 160 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | — |
| Height | 43.9 mm | — |
| Width | 43.9 mm | — |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Sapphire crystal | Yes | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Premium version: Sapphire glass | — |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Pixel density | 353 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | — |
| Battery saver mode | 19 days | — |
| GPS battery life | 21 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 270 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Charging | Magnetic charging base | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Sport profiles | 160 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | Yes | — |
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Microphone | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Music on the watch | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
