NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip Max vs GTS 4 Mini

Amazfit Bip Max vs Amazfit GTS 4 Mini

What Bip Max does better (7) and where GTS 4 Mini wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip Max
Amazfit · 2026Bip Max
9.5Score
7 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Amazfit GTS 4 Mini
AmazfitGTS 4 Mini
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $100
9.6Display6.0
9.2Battery life8.4
3.4Build & durability8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip MaxGTS 4 Mini
49.5 × 49.510.941.8 × 36.79.1
Bip MaxGTS 4 MiniDifference
Case size49.5 mm41.8 mm+7.7 mm
Thickness10.9 mm9.1 mm+1.8 mm
Weight53 g31 g+21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip Max better than GTS 4 Mini?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 21 h+90%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 15 days+33%
  3. Screen size2.07″ vs 1.65″+25%
  4. Battery capacity550 mAh vs 270 mAh2×
  5. Resolution (width)432 px vs 336 px+29%
  6. Sport profiles150 vs 126+19%
  7. Pixel density324 ppi vs 309 ppi+5%

Why is GTS 4 Mini better than Bip Max?

  1. Weight52.6 g vs 31.2 g+69%
  2. Thickness10.9 mm vs 9.1 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare