NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Pro vs Forerunner 265

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 265

What Cheetah 2 Pro does better (9) and where Forerunner 265 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Pro
7.6Score
9 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $450
8.7Display5.0
5.6Battery life3.6
9.6Sports & outdoor5.0
8.8Smart features6.5
5.2Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 ProForerunner 265
48 × 4813.246.1 × 46.112.9
Cheetah 2 ProForerunner 265Difference
Height48 mm46.1 mm+1.9 mm
Width48 mm46.1 mm+1.9 mm
Thickness13.2 mm12.9 mm+0.3 mm
Weight46 g47 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Pro better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 13 days+54%
  2. GPS battery life26 h vs 20 h+30%
  3. Sport profiles170 vs 582.9×
  4. Storage32 GB vs 8 GB4×
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 14 h2.2×
  6. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 265: No
  7. Weight45.6 g vs 47 g+3%
  8. Resolution (width)466 px vs 416 px+12%
  9. Pixel density353 ppi vs 320 ppi+10%

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Cheetah 2 Pro?

  1. Thickness13.2 mm vs 12.9 mm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare