NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Vertix 2S

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Coros Vertix 2S

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (9) and where Vertix 2S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
9 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Coros Vertix 2S
Coros · 2024Vertix 2S
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $700
8.8Display4.4
9.7Battery life9.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor5.2
5.0Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraVertix 2S
47.4 × 47.413.350.3 × 50.316
Cheetah 2 UltraVertix 2SDifference
Height47.4 mm50.3 mm−2.9 mm
Width47.4 mm50.3 mm−2.9 mm
Thickness13.3 mm16 mm−2.7 mm
Weight52 g87 g−35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Vertix 2S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertix 2S: No
  2. Weight52 g vs 87 g+67%
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 434.2×
  4. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  5. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 280 px+71%
  7. Pixel density323 ppi vs 200 ppi+62%
  8. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 43 h+40%
  9. Thickness13.3 mm vs 16 mm+20%

Why is Vertix 2S better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 36 days+20%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare