NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Approach S72 47mm

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Garmin Approach S72 47mm

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (4) and where Approach S72 47mm wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S72 47mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 47mm
6.5Score
1 advantage≈ $800
8.8Display6.5
4.9Health tracking8.3
9.6Sports & outdoor6.7
4.1Smart features3.2
5.0Build & durability5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraApproach S72 47mm
47.4 × 47.413.347 × 4713.5
Cheetah 2 UltraApproach S72 47mmDifference
Height47.4 mm47 mm+0.4 mm
Width47.4 mm47 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness13.3 mm13.5 mm−0.2 mm
Weight52 g48 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Approach S72 47mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 16 days+88%
  2. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is Approach S72 47mm better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Weight52 g vs 48 g+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare