NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Race 3S

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Suunto Race 3S

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (4) and where Race 3S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ $490
8.8Display7.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor6.2
5.0Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraRace 3S
47.4 × 47.413.346 × 4611.4
Cheetah 2 UltraRace 3SDifference
Height47.4 mm46 mm+1.4 mm
Width47.4 mm46 mm+1.4 mm
Thickness13.3 mm11.4 mm+1.9 mm
Weight52 g56 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Race 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 12 days2.5×
  2. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.32″+14%
  3. Weight52 g vs 56 g+8%
  4. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Race 3S better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Thickness13.3 mm vs 11.4 mm+17%
  2. Pixel density323 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare