NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Round vs Pace 3

Amazfit Cheetah Round vs Coros Pace 3

What Cheetah Round does better (8) and where Pace 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Round
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Round
6.9Score
8 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $200
8.0Display3.4
6.0Battery life5.3
9.7Sports & outdoor2.3
4.6Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah RoundPace 3
46.7 × 46.711.941.9 × 41.911.7
Cheetah RoundPace 3Difference
Height46.7 mm41.9 mm+4.8 mm
Width46.7 mm41.9 mm+4.8 mm
Thickness11.9 mm11.7 mm+0.2 mm
Weight32 g39 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Round better than Pace 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pace 3: No
  2. GPS battery life44 h vs 38 h+16%
  3. Sport profiles150 vs 285.4×
  4. Weight32 g vs 39 g+22%
  5. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.2″+16%
  6. Resolution (width)454 px vs 240 px+89%
  7. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 15 h+73%
  8. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%

Why is Pace 3 better than Cheetah Round?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 15 days+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare