NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Round vs Pace 4 Aluminum

Amazfit Cheetah Round vs Coros Pace 4 Aluminum

What Cheetah Round does better (5) and where Pace 4 Aluminum wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Round
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Round
6.9Score
5 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
2 advantages≈ $280
8.0Display5.3
6.0Battery life7.1
9.7Sports & outdoor3.8
4.6Build & durability3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah RoundPace 4 Aluminum
46.7 × 46.711.943.4 × 43.411.8
Cheetah RoundPace 4 AluminumDifference
Height46.7 mm43.4 mm+3.3 mm
Width46.7 mm43.4 mm+3.3 mm
Thickness11.9 mm11.8 mm+0.1 mm
Weight32 g41 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Round better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. Sport profiles150 vs 285.4×
  2. GPS battery life44 h vs 41 h+7%
  3. Weight32 g vs 41 g+28%
  4. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.2″+16%
  5. Resolution (width)454 px vs 390 px+16%

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than Cheetah Round?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 19 days+36%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 31 h+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare