vs
7.1Display5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
GTR 4ICE Smart Chic 2.0 Smartwatch Unisex, gold, Milanaise
| GTR 4 | ICE Smart Chic 2.0 Smartwatch Unisex, gold, Milanaise | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mm | 37 mm | +9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GTR 4 better than ICE Smart Chic 2.0 Smartwatch Unisex, gold, Milanaise?
- Battery capacity475 mAh vs 180 mAh2.6×
Why is ICE Smart Chic 2.0 Smartwatch Unisex, gold, Milanaise better than GTR 4?
ICE Smart Chic 2.0 Smartwatch Unisex, gold, Milanaise has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 37 mm |
| Weight | 34 g | — |
| Thickness | 10.6 mm | — |
| Height | 46 mm | — |
| Width | 46 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Tempered glass + | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.41″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | — |
| GPS battery life | 44 h | — |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 25 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 475 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Charging | Magnetic charging | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Sport profiles | 150 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Microphone | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Zepp OS | Proprietär |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
