vs
6.1Display8.8
Why is GTS 4 Mini better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Weight31.2 g vs 160 g5.1×
- Battery capacity270 mAh vs 210 mAh+29%
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than GTS 4 Mini?
- Screen size1.65″ vs 1.7″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 31.2 g | 160 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | — |
| Height | 36.7 mm | — |
| Width | 41.8 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Tempered glass + | — |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 336 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 384 px | — |
| Pixel density | 309 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 15 days | — |
| GPS battery life | 21 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 270 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Charging | Magnetic charger | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Sport profiles | 126 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Microphone | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Zepp OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Amazfit GTS 4 MinivsOPPO Watch9.59.5vs
Amazfit GTS 4 MinivsHonor Watch 49.59.5vs
Amazfit GTS 4 MinivsIce Watch Smart 3.09.59.0vs
Amazfit GTS 4 MinivsGarett Prime Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glassvs
Amazfit GTS 4 MinivsHiFuture Active Smartwatch 1,43" AMOLEDvs
Amazfit GTS 4 MinivsLotus Smartime 50024