vs
9.7Build & durability5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Helio CoreWatch Fit 3
| Helio Core | Watch Fit 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 24.3 mm | 43.2 mm | −18.9 mm |
| Width | 33.9 mm | 36.3 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 9.9 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 11 g | 26 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Helio Core better than Watch Fit 3?
- Weight11.2 g vs 26 g2.3×
- Thickness9.6 mm vs 9.9 mm+3%
Why is Watch Fit 3 better than Helio Core?
- Built-in GPSNo · Helio Core: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 11.2 g | 26 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 24.3 mm | 43.2 mm |
| Width | 33.9 mm | 36.3 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.82″ |
| Display technology | No display | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 408 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 232 mAh | — |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
