NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 2 vs Pace 2

Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Coros Pace 2

What T-Rex 2 does better (8) and where Pace 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 2
Amazfit · 2022T-Rex 2
9.5Score
8 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 2
Coros · 2020Pace 2
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ $180
8.0Display2.9
7.9Battery life3.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor2.3
8.5Build & durability3.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 2Pace 2
47.1 × 47.113.642 × 4211.7
T-Rex 2Pace 2Difference
Height47.1 mm42 mm+5.1 mm
Width47.1 mm42 mm+5.1 mm
Thickness13.6 mm11.7 mm+2 mm
Weight66 g35 g+32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 2 better than Pace 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 11 days2.2×
  2. GPS battery life50 h vs 27 h+85%
  3. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  4. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pace 2: No
  5. Sport profiles158 vs 207.9×
  6. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.2″+16%
  7. Resolution (width)454 px vs 240 px+89%
  8. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%

Why is Pace 2 better than T-Rex 2?

  1. Weight66.5 g vs 35 g+90%
  2. Thickness13.6 mm vs 11.7 mm+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare