NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 2 vs 5 PEAK

Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Suunto 5 PEAK

What T-Rex 2 does better (9) and where 5 PEAK wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 2
Amazfit · 2022T-Rex 2
9.5Score
9 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
vs
Suunto 5 PEAK
Suunto · 20225 PEAK
3.5Score
2 advantages≈ $170
8.0Display2.0
7.9Battery life2.3
9.6Sports & outdoor2.3
8.5Build & durability2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 25 PEAK
47.1 × 47.113.643 × 4312.9
T-Rex 25 PEAKDifference
Height47.1 mm43 mm+4.1 mm
Width47.1 mm43 mm+4.1 mm
Thickness13.6 mm12.9 mm+0.8 mm
Weight66 g39 g+28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 2 better than 5 PEAK?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 7 days3.4×
  2. GPS battery life50 h vs 20 h2.5×
  3. Water resistance10 ATM vs 3 ATM3.3×
  4. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 5 PEAK: No
  5. Dual-band GPSYes · 5 PEAK: No
  6. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.1″+26%
  7. Resolution (width)454 px vs 218 px2.1×
  8. Sport profiles158 vs 80+98%
  9. Pixel density326 ppi vs 198 ppi+65%

Why is 5 PEAK better than T-Rex 2?

  1. Weight66.5 g vs 39 g+71%
  2. Thickness13.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare