NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 2 vs Race

Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Suunto Race

What T-Rex 2 does better (4) and where Race wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 2
Amazfit · 2022T-Rex 2
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race
Suunto · 2023Race
8.6Score
5 advantages≈ $320
8.0Display4.8
7.9Battery life8.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor6.4
8.5Build & durability8.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 2Race
47.1 × 47.113.649 × 4913.3
T-Rex 2RaceDifference
Height47.1 mm49 mm−1.9 mm
Width47.1 mm49 mm−1.9 mm
Thickness13.6 mm13.3 mm+0.3 mm
Weight66 g83 g−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 2 better than Race?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race: No
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 20.8 days+15%
  3. Weight66.5 g vs 83 g+25%
  4. Sport profiles158 vs 95+66%

Why is Race better than T-Rex 2?

  1. GPS battery life50 h vs 65 h+30%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 50 h+92%
  3. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.43″+3%
  4. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
  5. Thickness13.6 mm vs 13.3 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare