NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs T-Rex Dual Solar

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (5) and where T-Rex Dual Solar wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $650
9.7Display8.7
9.0Battery life8.2
9.6Health tracking9.6
9.5Sports & outdoor9.5
4.1Smart features4.1
8.6Build & durability9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProT-Rex Dual Solar
48 × 481451.4 × 51.414.5
T-Rex 3 ProT-Rex Dual SolarDifference
Height48 mm51.4 mm−3.4 mm
Width48 mm51.4 mm−3.4 mm
Thickness14 mm14.5 mm−0.5 mm
Weight74 g69 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.32″+14%
  2. Pixel density466 ppi vs 353 ppi+32%
  3. Battery capacity700 mAh vs 660 mAh+6%
  4. Thickness14 mm vs 14.5 mm+4%
  5. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Weight74.5 g vs 69 g+8%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 41 h+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare