NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs T-Rex 3 Pro

Amazfit Falcon vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro

What Falcon does better (3) and where T-Rex 3 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
3 advantages≈ $500
vs
Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
6.6Display9.7
5.3Battery life9.0
9.8Sports & outdoor9.5
9.6Build & durability8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconT-Rex 3 Pro
49.4 × 47.21348 × 4814
FalconT-Rex 3 ProDifference
Height47.2 mm48 mm−0.8 mm
Width49.4 mm48 mm+1.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14 mm−1.1 mm
Weight64 g74 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight64 g vs 74.5 g+16%
  3. Thickness13 mm vs 14 mm+8%

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 25 days+79%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 85 h2.2×
  3. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.5″+17%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 38 h+81%
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 466 ppi+43%
  6. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 700 mAh+40%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 480 px+15%
  8. Sport profiles160 vs 180+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare