NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Race 2

Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Race 2

What Falcon does better (4) and where Race 2 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
6 advantages≈ $510
6.6Display6.3
5.3Battery life8.0
9.8Sports & outdoor6.4
9.6Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconRace 2
49.4 × 47.21349 × 4912.5
FalconRace 2Difference
Height47.2 mm49 mm−1.8 mm
Width49.4 mm49 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness13 mm12.5 mm+0.4 mm
Weight64 g76 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Race 2?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight64 g vs 76 g+19%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 95+68%
  4. Pixel density326 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Race 2 better than Falcon?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 65 h+71%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 18 days+29%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 55 h2.6×
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.5″+17%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  6. Thickness13 mm vs 12.5 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare