NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Hybrid CONNECTED 20002

Amazfit Falcon vs Lotus Hybrid CONNECTED 20002

What Falcon does better (3) and where Hybrid CONNECTED 20002 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
3 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Lotus Hybrid CONNECTED 20002
0 advantages≈ $330
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconHybrid CONNECTED 20002
49.4 × 47.21343 × 43
FalconHybrid CONNECTED 20002Difference
Case size49.4 mm43 mm+6.5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Hybrid CONNECTED 20002?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 10 days+40%
  3. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 104 mAh4.8×

Why is Hybrid CONNECTED 20002 better than Falcon?

Hybrid CONNECTED 20002 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare