NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Vertical 2

Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Falcon does better (5) and where Vertical 2 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $640
6.6Display6.3
5.3Battery life8.5
9.8Sports & outdoor6.4
9.6Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconVertical 2
49.4 × 47.21349 × 4913.6
FalconVertical 2Difference
Height47.2 mm49 mm−1.8 mm
Width49.4 mm49 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness13 mm13.6 mm−0.7 mm
Weight64 g87 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Vertical 2?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight64 g vs 87 g+36%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 95+68%
  4. Thickness13 mm vs 13.6 mm+5%
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Falcon?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 75 h+97%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 20 days+43%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 65 h3.1×
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.5″+17%
  5. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 620 mAh+24%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare