NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs T-Rex Ultra 2

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (4) and where T-Rex Ultra 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
3 advantages≈ $550
9.7Display8.8
9.0Battery life8.2
9.6Health tracking9.6
9.5Sports & outdoor9.5
4.1Smart features4.1
8.6Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProT-Rex Ultra 2
48 × 481451 × 5114.3
T-Rex 3 ProT-Rex Ultra 2Difference
Height48 mm51 mm−3 mm
Width48 mm51 mm−3 mm
Thickness14 mm14.3 mm−0.3 mm
Weight74 g89 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. GPS battery life85 h vs 40 h2.1×
  2. Weight74.5 g vs 89.2 g+20%
  3. Pixel density466 ppi vs 322 ppi+45%
  4. Thickness14 mm vs 14.3 mm+2%

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 30 days+20%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 50 h+32%
  3. Battery capacity700 mAh vs 870 mAh+24%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare