NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs Pace 4 Pro

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Coros Pace 4 Pro

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (7) and where Pace 4 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $450
9.7Display8.4
9.0Battery life8.3
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor4.2
4.1Smart features6.5
8.6Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProPace 4 Pro
48 × 481447.6 × 47.611.8
T-Rex 3 ProPace 4 ProDifference
Height48 mm47.6 mm+0.4 mm
Width48 mm47.6 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness14 mm11.8 mm+2.2 mm
Weight74 g51 g+24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 21 days+19%
  3. GPS battery life85 h vs 60 h+42%
  4. Sport profiles180 vs 315.8×
  5. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.47″+2%
  6. Pixel density466 ppi vs 317 ppi+47%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Weight74.5 g vs 51 g+46%
  2. Thickness14 mm vs 11.8 mm+19%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 40 h+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare