NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs GT1

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Cubot GT1

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (6) and where GT1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
6 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Cubot GT1
Cubot · 2024GT1
5.3Score
1 advantage
9.7Display4.2
9.6Health tracking5.0
9.5Sports & outdoor4.7
4.1Smart features3.9
8.6Build & durability2.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProGT1
48 × 481451.9 × 53.913.2
T-Rex 3 ProGT1Difference
Height48 mm53.9 mm−5.9 mm
Width48 mm51.9 mm−3.9 mm
Thickness14 mm13.2 mm+0.8 mm
Weight74 g92 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than GT1?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · GT1: No
  3. Weight74.5 g vs 92 g+23%
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.43″+5%
  5. Battery capacity700 mAh vs 480 mAh+46%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is GT1 better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Thickness14 mm vs 13.2 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare