NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (9) and where Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
9 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $350
9.7Display5.9
9.0Battery life5.6
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.6
8.6Build & durability5.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProInstinct 3 45mm AMOLED
48 × 481445 × 4514.9
T-Rex 3 ProInstinct 3 45mm AMOLEDDifference
Height48 mm45 mm+3 mm
Width48 mm45 mm+3 mm
Thickness14 mm14.9 mm−0.9 mm
Weight74 g53 g+22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life85 h vs 32 h2.7×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 18 days+39%
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.2″+25%
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED: No
  5. Sport profiles180 vs 96+88%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 23 h+65%
  7. Pixel density466 ppi vs 325 ppi+43%
  8. Resolution (width)480 px vs 390 px+23%
  9. Thickness14 mm vs 14.9 mm+6%

Why is Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Weight74.5 g vs 53 g+41%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare